Food Systems Scorecard Reveals Climate Blind Spot in National Plans

Belém, Brazil – As global leaders gather for COP30 in Belém, a groundbreaking new analysis reveals a significant oversight in national climate plans: the limited integration of food systems. The ‘Food Systems NDC Scorecard,’ released today by Mercy For Animals and a coalition of organizations, evaluates how countries are addressing the substantial climate impact of food production, distribution, consumption, and waste. The findings expose a critical “blind spot” in national commitments, with many plans focusing narrowly on agricultural production while neglecting the transformative potential of demand-side solutions like shifting dietary patterns.

A Third of Emissions, A Fraction of the Focus

Food systems are responsible for approximately one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, a figure often underestimated in climate discussions. According to the report, even a complete cessation of fossil fuel emissions wouldn’t be enough to meet the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C target without addressing emissions from food. The scorecard underscores the urgency of a holistic approach, arguing that current Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) – national plans for reducing emissions – are falling short.

“For too long, food systems have been treated as a secondary concern in climate policy,” explains a spokesperson for Mercy For Animals. “This scorecard demonstrates that overlooking this crucial sector is not only short-sighted but jeopardizes our ability to achieve meaningful climate progress.”

Methodology and Key Findings
The ‘Food Systems NDC Scorecard’ adopts a rigorous methodology, evaluating NDCs across four key areas: scope of food systems coverage (addressing all stages from production to waste), context-specific action (examining depth of integration across crucial sub-areas), promotion of synergies and avoidance of maladaptation, and equity and inclusiveness in NDC development. Each area is scored from 0-3, providing a comprehensive assessment of national climate plans.

The analysis reveals a concerning trend: a disproportionate focus on agricultural production at the expense of addressing consumption patterns. The report highlights the significant potential of shifting towards more sustainable diets, particularly reducing the consumption of resource-intensive animal products.

Leaders and Laggards: A Global Snapshot
The scorecard identifies a handful of nations leading the charge in integrating food systems into their climate strategies. Switzerland received a “very strong” rating, demonstrating a comprehensive approach that targets both production emissions and dietary shifts. Kenya stands out as a leader among low- and middle-income nations, demonstrating that ambitious action is achievable even with limited resources.

However, the analysis also reveals significant laggards. Brazil and New Zealand are flagged for missed opportunities, with their NDCs lacking policies to encourage sustainable dietary changes. The report specifically criticizes Brazil's continued plans for expanding cattle production, a move that runs counter to climate goals. The United Arab Emirates also receives a low score, indicating a narrow focus on production-side solutions.

“We were particularly concerned to see some countries actively pursuing policies that exacerbate emissions, despite the urgent need for decarbonization,” said a policy analyst involved in the research. “It’s clear that a significant policy shift is needed.”

The Shadow of Corporate Influence?

The scorecard’s findings raise questions about the role of corporate interests in shaping national climate policies. Several sources involved in the research suggest that powerful lobbying efforts by industries reliant on unsustainable food systems may be hindering progress.

“There’s a clear tension between the need for ambitious climate action and the vested interests of certain industries,” said a researcher who requested anonymity. “We’ve seen examples of policies being watered down or delayed due to pressure from these groups.”

Experts point to the prevalence of incentives for meat and dairy production in some countries, which encourage unsustainable practices and contribute to deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions. The continued expansion of livestock farming, despite its significant environmental impact, is seen as a clear example of how corporate interests can undermine climate goals.

Beyond Production: A Call for Demand-Side Solutions
The report stresses the importance of addressing the demand side of the food equation. Shifting towards more plant-based diets, reducing food waste, and promoting sustainable food choices are identified as crucial steps towards decarbonizing the food system.

“Focusing solely on production efficiency isn’t enough,” said a food systems expert involved in the research. “We need to fundamentally change the way we produce, distribute, and consume food. This requires addressing dietary patterns, reducing food waste, and promoting sustainable food choices.”

According to the report, reducing food waste alone could cut global greenhouse gas emissions by up to 8-10%. Shifting towards more plant-based diets could reduce emissions from agriculture by up to 70%.

Raising Awareness at COP30
The launch of the ‘Food Systems NDC Scorecard’ at COP30 is intended to elevate this critical issue and spur action. Mercy For Animals and its partners are hosting a press conference and releasing a series of reports and briefing materials to raise awareness among policymakers, media, and the public.

“We’re calling on governments to recognize the transformative potential of food systems reform,” said a spokesperson for Mercy For Animals. “We need to see ambitious policies that address all stages of the food system, from production to consumption. The time for half measures is over.”

The scorecard serves as a vital tool for assessing progress, identifying gaps, and charting a course towards a more sustainable and resilient food system. By highlighting the urgent need for action, the report hopes to inspire governments, businesses, and individuals to embrace a more holistic and sustainable approach to food. The future of our planet depends on it.