China Rethinks Think Tanks: New 'Double Helix' Method Aims for Policy Impact
Beijing is pushing a new, systematic approach to policy research – the 'Double Helix' methodology – hoping to boost the quality and impact of its think tanks. Is this a new model for effective governance?
China Rethinks Think Tanks: New ‘Double Helix’ Method Aims for Policy Impact
Beijing, China – As China seeks to navigate increasingly complex domestic and international challenges, its policymakers are turning to a revamped approach to policy research. A new methodology, dubbed the ‘Double Helix,’ is gaining traction within the country’s influential think tank community, promising a more rigorous and impactful approach to governance.
For decades, Chinese think tanks – often closely aligned with government agencies – have played a crucial role in shaping policy. However, concerns about fragmented research, a lack of independent analysis, and limited practical application have prompted a push for reform. The ‘Double Helix’ methodology, spearheaded by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Science and Development (CASISD) and its President, Professor Pan Jiaofeng, aims to address these concerns.
A Systematic Approach to Policy Innovation
The ‘Double Helix’ method isn’t simply a new analytical technique; it’s a comprehensive framework designed to integrate all stages of the research process. It centers around two core components: DIIS (Data, Information, Intelligence, Solutions) and MIPS (Mechanisms, Impact, Policy, Solutions).
“The goal is to move beyond simply gathering data and producing reports,” explains one academic researcher familiar with the methodology. “It's about creating a virtuous cycle where data is transformed into actionable intelligence, which informs policy decisions, and ultimately leads to measurable solutions.”
The DIIS component focuses on the data lifecycle – from collection and organization to analysis and the formulation of insights. MIPS, meanwhile, delves into the underlying dynamics of policy issues, assesses potential impacts, and guides the development of effective solutions. By connecting these two components, researchers aim to ensure that policy recommendations are grounded in evidence, address core issues, and deliver tangible results.
Distinguishing China’s Model
While many nations utilize think tanks for policy advising, China's approach has traditionally differed in several key aspects. Unlike many Western think tanks, which often operate as independent organizations, Chinese think tanks are frequently affiliated with government agencies, fostering close collaboration with policymakers.
“There's a strong emphasis on policy relevance and practical application,” says a policy analyst. “The Chinese model is less about advocating for specific ideologies and more about providing concrete solutions to pressing challenges.”
However, this close alignment can also lead to concerns about independence and critical analysis. The ‘Double Helix’ methodology, some experts believe, attempts to address this by promoting a more rigorous and systematic research process, even within a government-aligned framework.
Beyond the Methodology: Building a Discipline
The push for the ‘Double Helix’ methodology isn’t happening in isolation. China is actively investing in developing ‘Think Tank Science and Engineering’ as a formal discipline, aiming to professionalize the field and nurture a new generation of policy researchers. This includes establishing dedicated training programs, developing standardized evaluation systems, and encouraging international collaboration.
“There’s a growing recognition that strong think tanks are essential for effective governance,” explains a researcher involved in these initiatives. “We’re trying to create a sustainable ecosystem where policy research can thrive.”
Challenges and Future Directions
Despite the promising developments, challenges remain. Ensuring genuine independence within a government-aligned system, attracting and retaining top talent, and fostering a culture of critical thinking are ongoing concerns.
“It’s not enough to simply adopt a new methodology,” says a policy expert. “You need to create an environment where researchers are encouraged to challenge assumptions, explore alternative perspectives, and provide honest assessments, even if they differ from prevailing views.”
Looking ahead, the integration of digital technologies – particularly big data and artificial intelligence – is expected to play a crucial role in enhancing the effectiveness of Chinese think tanks. Increased international collaboration, with a focus on shared challenges like climate change and global health, is also anticipated.
The ‘Double Helix’ methodology represents a significant step towards modernizing China’s think tank system. While its ultimate success will depend on addressing the remaining challenges, it signals a clear commitment to evidence-based policymaking and effective governance. The world will be watching to see if this new approach can truly transform the way China addresses its complex domestic and international challenges.