- 10 new large-scale reactors planned by 2035, with at least one outside Ontario
- Nuclear workforce to double from 90,000 to 180,000 by 2050
- Canada aims to double uranium exports over the next decade
Experts would likely conclude that while Canada's nuclear strategy is ambitious and necessary for net-zero goals, its success hinges on overcoming financial, logistical, and public trust challenges.
Canada Doubles Down on Nuclear in Ambitious Net-Zero Energy Strategy
NEWMARKET, ON – June 22, 2026 – The Government of Canada today unveiled a sweeping national Nuclear Energy Strategy, signaling a decisive pivot towards atomic power as the backbone of its 2050 net-zero ambitions. Announced by Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson, the strategy aims to cement Canada's role as a global "energy superpower" by leveraging its 70-year history in the sector to meet skyrocketing electricity demand, create high-skilled jobs, and drive economic growth.
This marks a veritable civilian nuclear renaissance, moving the technology from a contentious option to a stated cornerstone of national policy. The plan complements Canada's recently released National Electricity Strategy, which projects that the country must double its grid capacity by mid-century to power an electrified economy. Officials argue that this goal is simply unattainable without a massive expansion of nuclear energy, the only non-emitting source capable of providing constant, dependable baseload power.
"We are moving at speeds not seen in generations to get big things done and leveraging pre-existing strengths to become a modern energy superpower," Minister Hodgson stated, framing the strategy as a move to secure affordability, sovereignty, and a clean future for Canadians.
A Four-Pillar Blueprint for Expansion
The strategy is built on four pillars designed to revitalize and expand the entire nuclear ecosystem. It goes far beyond maintaining the current fleet of 17 CANDU reactors, which provide 13 percent of Canada's electricity. The government's vision involves building big, with ambitious targets that would fundamentally reshape the country's energy landscape.
The plan calls for enabling the construction of up to ten new large-scale reactors across the country, with two targeted to be under construction by 2035. It also mandates that at least one new reactor project begin outside of the traditional nuclear heartland of Ontario by the same year. To support this, the government pledges to ensure a modernized, cost-competitive design for its homegrown CANDU technology is available by 2030.
Innovation is another core focus, with plans to develop a Canadian-made microreactor by 2035 for deployment in remote communities and military installations. This is in addition to supporting flagship projects like the Darlington New Nuclear Project, which is on track to deploy the first Small Modular Reactor (SMR) in the G7. The strategy aims to double the nuclear workforce from 90,000 to over 180,000 by 2050, a goal supported by unions like the Society of United Professionals, which praised the commitment to collaborative training programs.
The High-Stakes Economics of Building Big
While the vision is grand, its execution rests on navigating formidable financial and logistical challenges. The strategy itself comes with no new direct funding. Instead, it points to a forthcoming federal financing policy, promised by April 2027, that will outline how Ottawa plans to de-risk these multi-billion-dollar projects to attract the necessary private capital from pension funds and global investors.
With the cost of new large-scale reactors potentially exceeding $100 billion collectively, the success of this financing framework is paramount. The government is banking on the recent success of refurbishment projects at Bruce Power and Darlington—completed on time and under budget—to build investor confidence. It also hopes to leverage federal entities like the Canada Growth Fund and Canada Infrastructure Bank, which have already committed a combined $3 billion to the Darlington SMR project.
However, independent analysts caution that ambition must be tempered with realism. A February 2026 report from the energy think tank Clean Prosperity warned that without a concerted effort to address supply chain and workforce bottlenecks, Canada's nuclear expansion could face the same kind of major cost overruns and project delays that have plagued the industry globally. Doubling a highly specialized workforce in just over two decades will require an unprecedented national mobilization of skilled trades and engineering talent.
From Prairie Mines to Global Grids
The strategy's most compelling aspect may be its ambition to integrate Canada's entire nuclear supply chain. The plan looks to leverage the country's unique position as both a resource giant and a technology leader. Canada is the world's second-largest producer of uranium and holds the highest-grade deposits on the planet, with most of the mining concentrated in Saskatchewan. The strategy aims to double uranium exports over the next decade.
This resource wealth is paired with a plan to become a global "supplier and exporter of choice" for nuclear technology. The government intends to market its modernized CANDU reactors to at least four new international markets by 2040, capitalizing on a global nuclear market projected to reach $200 billion annually by 2030. The deployment of advanced SMRs at Darlington is positioned as a key demonstrator project to showcase Canadian project management and regulatory expertise to the world.
This full-circle approach—from mining uranium in Saskatchewan to exporting Canadian-built reactors—is designed to enhance energy sovereignty and project Canada's industrial and geopolitical influence on a world hungry for clean, secure energy.
Navigating Public Trust and Technical Hurdles
For all the strategic planning, the ultimate success of Canada's nuclear future will hinge on public acceptance and resolving the sector's most persistent challenge: nuclear waste. The strategy explicitly includes supporting "world-class long-term nuclear waste management" as a pillar, requiring all new project proponents to present credible, funded disposal plans. The Nuclear Waste Management Organization continues its decades-long process of finding a willing host community for a deep geological repository, a process fraught with social and political complexity.
Environmental groups and some Indigenous communities remain deeply skeptical. Organizations like the Coalition for Responsible Energy Development in New Brunswick have historically opposed public funding for new reactors and raised concerns about waste disposal on traditional territories. The government's promise to work with Indigenous Peoples, provinces, and communities will be tested as potential sites for new reactors and waste facilities are identified.
Notably, Prime Minister Mark Carney was recused from the strategy's development due to a conflict-of-interest screen, a measure put in place after his former company, Brookfield Asset Management, acquired a major stake in nuclear giant Westinghouse. While handled through official channels, it underscores the intricate web of interests at play in this high-stakes industrial policy. This strategy is not merely an energy plan; it is a generational bet on Canada's ability to execute complex, long-term projects in pursuit of a cleaner and more prosperous future.
